June 2, 2022
Landmark Ruling: Court Partially Denies Motion to Dismiss in the Magellan Health, Inc. Data Breach Litigation, the Case Moves On
In a momentous development on June 1, 2022, United States District Judge Michael T. Liburdi delivered a crucial decision, denying in substantial part Magellan Health Inc.'s second motion to dismiss, signaling a crucial juncture in the ongoing data breach litigation. Magellan Health had sought to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint (SACC) on October 26, 2021, citing a failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The recent ruling by the Court indicates a meticulous examination of the presented arguments.
While the decision led to the dismissal of certain parties and claims from the litigation, the Court rejected Magellan's motion concerning specific negligence claims, unjust enrichment claims, and various state law claims. This landmark ruling not only shapes the trajectory of the ongoing legal battle but also establishes a precedent for the involved parties and the broader legal landscape.
The case, initiated by the Kehoe Law Firm, revolves around a class action lawsuit against Magellan Health, Inc., alleging the inadequate safeguarding of personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) belonging to its current and former employees, as well as health plan participants. The lawsuit follows a targeted cyberattack and data breach, affecting plaintiffs and over 365,000 class members.
Compromised information, encompassing names, contact details, employee ID numbers, W-2 or 1099 information, Social Security Numbers, taxpayer identification numbers, treatment details, health insurance account information, member IDs, and other health-related data, is alleged to be in the possession of cyberthieves. The complaint contends that Magellan Health's negligent maintenance of this sensitive information on its computer network left it vulnerable to cyberattacks.
Michael Yarnoff, Partner at Kehoe Law Firm, underscored the significance of personal information and corporations' responsibility to protect it, stating, "In an era where personal data is increasingly under threat, corporations must prioritize the protection of sensitive information. The allegations against Magellan Health underscore the importance of robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard personal and health-related details."
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact Michael Yarnoff at myarnoff@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
May 19, 2021
Wheels of Justice Favor Plaintiffs in Kehoe Law Firm Defective Corvette Wheel Case
In a groundbreaking development, a federal judge has refused to dismiss significant claims in the Corvette Cracked Wheels Lawsuit, paving the way for justice in the ongoing legal battle against General Motors (GM). The lawsuit alleges that certain Chevrolet Corvette models suffer from cracked, bent, and warped wheels, and the recent decision by the judge ensures that many of the claims will move forward.
The class action lawsuit, which includes 2015-19 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and 2017-2019 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport cars, alleges GM of equipped the vehicles with cast aluminum alloy wheels unable to withstand the torque and power generated by the cars. The plaintiffs argue that the cast wheels are too weak, and GM allegedly knew that forged rims would have been a more suitable choice. Additionally, the lawsuit claims GM used insufficient material to save on suspension weight, leading to deformed and cracked wheels that could cost thousands of dollars to replace.
Michael Yarnoff, Partner with the Kehoe Law Firm, expressed his satisfaction with the judge's decision, stating, "We are very pleased with the court's ruling, which acknowledges the validity of our claims and allows us to continue seeking justice on behalf of the affected Corvette owners."
The lawsuit alleges that Corvette owners experience wobbling and vibrations when the rims deform, and cracks in the wheels can lead to loss of air pressure, making the cars unsafe. The plaintiffs contend that GM replaces the defective wheels with equally defective ones, putting owners at continued risk.
GM's attempts to dismiss the lawsuit faced resistance from the judge, who ruled against the automaker's arguments, allowing express warranty claims, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) claims, and other crucial claims to proceed. Despite GM's motion to dismiss MMWA claims based on the number of plaintiffs, the judge permitted the claims to move forward with the existing eighteen plaintiffs.
The legal battle, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, is gaining momentum as the judge's decision marks a pivotal moment for the Corvette owners seeking resolution for their wheel-related issues. Kehoe Law Firm remains committed to representing the interests of the affected consumers and seeks a fair resolution for those impacted by the alleged defects.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact Michael Yarnoff at myarnoff@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
December 23, 2020
Kehoe Law Firm Represents Sterling International Consulting Group and has Filed a Class Action Lawsuit Against Google for Monopolizing the Publisher Ad Server Market
The Kehoe Law Firm, a leading national law firm specializing in antitrust and consumer protection litigation, has filed a civil antitrust action against Google under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The class action complaint, filed on behalf of the Sterling International Consulting Group and those similarly situated, alleges that Google has engaged in an anticompetitive scheme to dominate the Publisher Ad Server Market, resulting in artificially inflated prices for publisher ad server services.
The plaintiff in this case operates a website that sells digital display ads to advertisers. The complaint contends that Google has established and maintained a monopoly in the Publisher Ad Server Market, giving it the power to manipulate prices charged to Publishers, such as the plaintiffs.
According to John A. Kehoe, a partner at the Kehoe Law Firm, "Google's anticompetitive actions have had a significant impact on the Publisher Ad Server Market, leading to higher costs for Publishers and limiting their options. This case aims to address the harm caused by Google's dominance and seeks compensatory and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act."
The complaint outlines Google's control over various levels of the Ad Tech Stack, including publisher ad server products, ad exchange, ad network, and advertiser ad server. It alleges that Google's series of anticompetitive acts, dating back to at least 2007, have illegally enhanced and maintained its dominant position in the Publisher Ad Server Market.
The complaint alleges that Google's acquisitions, exclusionary conduct, and measures to impair potential rivals have stifled competition and harmed plaintiffs and members of the proposed class. The complaint seeks compensatory and injunctive relief for violations of the Sherman Act.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
December 16, 2020
Court Preliminarily Approves $20,700,000 Settlement on Behalf of Firm Client Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Pension Plan and Class Members
Kehoe Law Firm is pleased to announce that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted preliminary approval for the proposed settlement in the Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation.
The case, brought on behalf of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Pension Plan (“SEPTA”), among others, alleges that from January 1, 2006, through April 19, 2017, inclusive, various entities conspired to fix the prices for Mexican Government Bonds issued by the Mexican government through the Bank of Mexico (“Banxico”).
According to a complaint filed in the Southern District of New York, each defendant transacted in price-fixed Mexican Government Bonds (“MGBs”) at artificial prices with uninformed market participants like SEPTA and the Class. Defendants allegedly did so through interrelated means of manipulation.
Partner John A. Kehoe expressed his satisfaction in being part of the case on behalf of the Plaintiffs, stating, "We are pleased to have reached this partial settlement in the Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation. The preliminary approval of the proposed settlement is a positive step toward achieving justice for our clients and the Settlement Class."
The settlement class includes all persons who entered a MGB transaction between January 1, 2006, and April 19, 2017. The Settlement, subject to final approval, involves the certification and maintenance of the settlement class as a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Settling defendants include Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays Capital Securities Limited, Barclays Bank México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Barclays México, and Grupo Financiero Barclays México, S.A. de C.V. (collectively “ Barclays” ) and JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Broker-Dealer Holdings Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Banco J.P. Morgan, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc.
Importantly, many other defendants have not joined in the settlement, including entities related to Bank of America, Citibank, Deutsche Bank, and HSBC, among others. For further information about the case, please visit www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
December 9, 2020
SEPTA Files Second Amended MGB Complaint in Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation
The Kehoe Law Firm is delighted to announce that Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), along with co-plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension Retirement System, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust, Boston Retirement System, Government Employees Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, and United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund (collectively “Plaintiffs”), has filed a Second Amended Complaint in the Mexican Government Bonds antitrust litigation.
The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, represents Plaintiffs and all individuals involved in a Mexican Government Bond (“MGB”) transaction between January 1, 2006, and April 19, 2017. It alleges that during this period, the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix the prices for Mexican Government Bonds issued by the Mexican government through the Bank of Mexico (“Banxico”).
The complaint asserts that the defendants executed transactions involving pricefixed MGBs at artificial prices, impacting uninformed market participants such as Plaintiffs and the Class. The alleged manipulation was reportedly conducted through various interconnected means.
KLF Partner John A. Kehoe expressed his satisfaction with the progress, stating, "We are extremely pleased to file the Second Amended Complaint on behalf of our esteemed clients, including SEPTA. This collective action seeks justice for all those affected by the alleged antitrust violations related to Mexican Government Bonds. Furthermore, it is gratifying to report that we have already achieved a partial settlement, notably with entities associated with Barclays PLC and JP Morgan Chase & Co., who have committed $20.7 million to a settlement fund pending final court approval."
A copy of the complaint is available here: https://www.mgbantitrustsettlement.com/
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
November 19, 2020
Court Grants Approval to $23,630,000 Settlement in FX Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation on Behalf of Firm Client FX Primus Ltd.
On behalf of our client FX Primus Ltd., Kehoe Law Firm is pleased to announce that today the court granted final approval to the $23,630,000 settlement in the FX indirect purchaser litigation. The lawsuit against various Wall Street banks, alleges that defendants conspired to fix the prices of foreign currency instruments causing settlement class members to be overcharged when directly purchasing from or directly selling to a retail foreign exchange dealer (“RFED”) an FX instrument, where that RFED transacted in an FX instrument directly with a defendant.
Defendants include entities related to Citigroup, MUFG Bank Ltd., Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs, HSBC Bank PLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (now known as NatWest Markets PLC), and UBS AG. The settlements include statewide settlement classes from New York, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and North Carolina.
The defendants collectively paid $23,630,000 of settlements into a fund to be disbursed to the members of the settlement classes. You must file a valid and timely claim to get money from the settlements. You may get a Claim Form by visiting www.FXIndirectAntitrustSettlement.com or by contacting the Settlement Administrator toll-free number: 1-844-245-3777.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
October 30, 2020
FX Primus Ltd. Moves for Final Approval of FX Indirect Purchaser Settlements totaling $23,630,000.
Kehoe Law Firm proudly announces that today plaintiffs moved for final approval of a $23,600,000 settlement with various Wall Street banks, including entities related to Citigroup, MUFG Bank Ltd., Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs, HSBC Bank PLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (now known as NatWest Markets PLC), and UBS AG.
KLF represents FX Primus Ltd. In this action, in which lead counsel spent over 11,427 hours prosecuting the case. Discovery in this case was extensive, involving terabytes of transactional data and hundreds of thousands of pages of interbank chat transcripts from defendants that they produced in a related action. Managing and organizing this data required collaborating with Plaintiffs’ expert economist, Dr. Janet S. Netz, to analyze the contents of the data for each defendant transactional data production and prepare questions to Defendants to ensure that all required data fields were included in the productions and standardized across all Defendant productions.
Class Counsel also consulted with an industry expert and former FX trader to analyze and identify deficiencies in Defendants’ data productions and to prepare questions to Defendants. He also assisted Class Counsel with interpreting the jargon and code words that dealer bank traders used to conceal their unlawful conduct in the voluminous interbank dealer chat transcripts produced by Defendants.
While discovery was ongoing, class counsel had extensive settlement negotiations, and reached a tentative settlement with the Citigroup defendants, then with MUFG Bank Ltd., including cash payments and reasonable cooperation in the continued litigation. Thereafter, the remaining defendants agreed to settle.
We believe the settlements were negotiated at arm’s length, and the relief obtained is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The proposed pro-rata method of allocating the settlement fund amongst the members of the settlement classes ensures that they will be treated equitably relative to each other. The Total Settlement Amount of $23,630,000 is well within the range of reasonableness, especially considering the complexity of the litigation, and the risks of establishing liability, aggregate damages, and class wide impact.
Considering the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the Court has scheduled the Final Fairness Hearing to occur telephonically on November 17, 2020, at 11:30 am.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
October 29, 2020
KLF’s Class Action Against Magellan Health Exposes Alarming Data Breach and Inadequate Safeguarding of Personal Information
Today, the Kehoe Law Firm filed a class action lawsuit against Magellan Health, Inc. alleging the inadequate safeguarding of personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) of its current and former employees, as well as health plan participants. Magellan Health recently experienced a targeted cyberattack and data breach, resulting in the reported compromise of PII and PHI for plaintiffs and over 365,000 class members.
The compromised information, including names, contact details, employee ID numbers, W-2 or 1099 information, Social Security Numbers, taxpayer identification numbers, treatment details, health insurance account information, member IDs, and other health-related data, is now alleged to be in the hands of cyberthieves. The complaint further alleges that Magellan Health's reckless and negligent maintenance of this sensitive information on its computer network left it vulnerable to cyberattacks.
Michael Yarnoff of the Kehoe Law Firm emphasized the significance of personal information and the responsibility of corporations to protect it, stating, "In an era where personal data is increasingly under threat, corporations must prioritize the protection of sensitive information. The allegations against Magellan Health underscore the importance of robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard personal and health-related details."
Plaintiffs contend that Magellan Health failed to provide timely and adequate notice of the unauthorized access, exposing them to the risk of identity theft and fraud. The lawsuit seeks various remedies, including compensatory damages, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, restitution, and injunctive relief. The latter includes demands for enhancements to the defendant's data security systems, annual audits, and funded credit monitoring services.
The legal claims against Magellan Health include negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, violation of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, violation of Missouri’s Merchandising Practices Act, violation of New York’s General Business Law § 349, violation of Pennsylvania’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, violation of Virginia’s Personal Information Breach Notification Act, and violation of Wisconsin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact Michael Yarnoff at myarnoff@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
September 9, 2020
KLF Files Class Action Lawsuit Following Complaints Over Chevrolet Corvette Cracked Aluminum Wheels
Allegations of cracked aluminum wheels in Chevrolet Corvettes have given rise to a class action lawsuit, claiming that certain models suffer from rims that crack and bend, leading to tire leaks and blowouts.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, specifically targets 2015 to present Chevy Corvette Z06 and 2017 to present Corvette Grand Sport cars. The lawsuit asserts that these vehicles are equipped with rims made from a less durable cast material rather than forged, potentially compromising their structural integrity.
California resident Richard Barrington, one of the plaintiffs, purchased a new 2018 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport, only to discover a right rear tire leak within one or two months. Technicians confirmed that the rear wheel was cracked in three places, necessitating replacement. Subsequently, Barrington faced a similar issue with the driver-side rear wheel, allegedly denied warranty coverage by General Motors (GM). Despite driving the Corvette normally, Barrington claims to have spent approximately $3,000 replacing six cracked wheels.
The lawsuit contends that GM knowingly used cheaper cast aluminum and reduced material to save weight, making the rims insufficiently robust for regular driving conditions. This alleged issue has persisted since the cars were first sold, with GM purportedly aware of the problem but insisting that the rims are not defective. Corvette owners seeking warranty-covered wheel repairs are reportedly denied, leading them to shoulder the financial burden of replacing allegedly cracked wheels.
Citing a Car and Driver magazine report titled "Wheel Woes," the lawsuit alleges evidence of the widespread nature of the cracked wheel problem. The report includes a review of a 2017 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport that experienced three bent wheels, incurring a $1,119 repair bill.
Michael Yarnoff, Partner with the Kehoe Law Firm, expressed satisfaction with the filing of the complaint, stating, "We believe the claims are meritorious, and we are very pleased with the progress of the case."
Kehoe Law Firm remains committed to representing the interests of the affected consumers and seeks a fair resolution for those impacted by the alleged defects.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact Michael Yarnoff at myarnoff@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.
July 17, 2020
U.S. District Court Grants Final Approval for $16,500,000 NantHealth Settlement; Kehoe Law Firm Serving as Co-Lead Counsel
The United States District Court for the Central District of California has granted final approval to the securities litigation class action filed against NantHealth, Inc. and certain of its executives and directors. The suit alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Initiated on June 26, 2017, the case saw the Southern Pennsylvania Transit Authority appointed as lead plaintiff with the Kehoe Law Firm appointed co-lead counsel. The lawsuit claimed that NantHealth and its officers and directors misled investors by overstating the market demand for NantHealth’s genetic sequencing services. The lawsuit also claimed that NantHealth made false statements or omitted material information from its financial statements and in other public statements. NantHealth and its officers and directors deny they did anything wrong.
The Court granted class certification on July 30, 2019, and on January 31, 2020, preliminarily approved the settlement. The approved settlement establishes a $16,500,000.00 common fund for investors, less attorney fees and expenses.
The Court found the proposed pro rata distribution fair and adequate, especially considering the absence of objections from class members. The requested attorneys' fees of 25% were deemed presumptively reasonable given the complexity of the case. Additionally, the court granted SEPTA a $5,000.00 incentive award for its substantial efforts in the case.
John Kehoe, lead counsel from the Kehoe Law Firm, remarked, "This settlement is a testament to the diligent efforts of all involved parties. The approved terms reflect a fair and just resolution for the class members. We are pleased with the Court's decision and believe it underlines the strength of our case."
For more information, visit www.NantHealthSecuritiesLitigation.com, call 1-844-975-1779, or write to the Settlement Administrator, NantHealth, Inc. Securities Litigation, c/o JND Legal Administration, PO Box 91125, Seattle, WA 98111.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-
6676.
June 1, 2020
Kehoe Law Group Announces Partial $20,700,000 Settlement in Mexican Government Bond Litigation on Behalf of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Pension Plan and Class Members
Kehoe Law Firm is pleased to announce that a partial settlement has been reached with two defendants in the Mexican Government Bonds antitrust litigation. The settlements total $20,700,000 and were reached with Barclays PLC (and related entities) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (and related entities), on behalf of our client, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Pension Plan (“SEPTA”), and additional plaintiffs.
The settlement addresses allegations that the settling defendants, and others, conspired to fix the prices for Mexican Government Bonds issued by the Mexican government through the Bank of Mexico (“Banxico”). As alleged in the complaint, each defendant transacted in price fixed MGBs at artificial prices with uninformed market participants like Plaintiffs and the Class. Defendants allegedly did so through several interrelated means of manipulation.
SEPTA and plaintiffs’ lead counsel engaged in separate negotiations with Barclays and JPMorgan to reach negotiated resolutions of the claims against them. The Settlements allow SEPTA, Barclays, and JPMorgan to avoid the risks and costs of lengthy litigation and the uncertainty of pre-trial proceedings, a trial, and appeals, and, if approved, would permit eligible settlement class members, who file timely and valid claim forms, to receive compensation rather than risk ultimately receiving nothing.
SEPTA and plaintiffs’ lead counsel believe the $20,700,000 partial settlements are in the best interest of all settlement class members. Notably, the settlement does not include many other defendants that have chosen to not participate at this time. These defendants include entities related to Bank of America, Citibank, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, and others.
For more information about the case and the partial settlement, see a website maintained by the Mexican Government Bonds at: https://www.mgbantitrustsettlement.com/
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-
6676.
March 5, 2020
KLF Announces $16,500,000 NantHealth Securities Class Action Settlement; KLF Co-Lead Counsel
Kehoe Law Firm, court appointed lead counsel in the securities litigation captioned Deora v. NantHealth, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-01825-TJH-MRW, pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, announces the successful resolution of the class action. The case concerns the pricing of NantHealth stock, and the proposed settlement, valued at $16.5 million, is set to address claims by investors who purchased NantHealth common stock between June 1, 2016, and May 1, 2017.
Partner John A. Kehoe expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating, "We are pleased to have represented Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and to have achieved this extraordinary settlement in light of the risks of continued litigation."
Investors who acquired NantHealth stock between June 1, 2016, and May 1, 2017, are eligible for benefits, provided they bought the shares individually and not through a mutual fund. Certain individuals, including NantHealth officers, directors, and their families, are not considered Class Members.
The lawsuit alleged that NantHealth and officers and directors misled investors about the demand for its services. The settlement, while not admitting wrongdoing, aims to provide benefits to investors. The disagreement between the parties on potential trial outcomes led to the decision to settle.
NantHealth will establish a $16.5 million settlement fund to address claims by all Class Members. Payments will be determined based on the number of valid claim forms, the quantity of NantHealth stock purchased, and the timing of transactions. The settlement also includes attorneys' fees, cost reimbursements, and a compensatory award for the Class Representative.
Class Members can qualify for payment by submitting a claim form or doing so online by May 22, 2020. The detailed notice package, available through the website or by calling 1-844-975-1779, contains all necessary information.
Class Members have the option to exclude themselves from the settlement by May 22, 2020, to retain the ability to pursue individual legal actions. Alternatively, they can object to the settlement by the same date. The Court will hold a hearing on June 15, 2020, to decide on the settlement's approval.
For more information, visit www.NantHealthSecuritiesLitigation.com, call 1-844-975-1779, or write to the Settlement Administrator, NantHealth, Inc. Securities Litigation, c/o JND Legal Administration, PO Box 91125, Seattle, WA 98111.
For more information about Kehoe Law Firm and its involvement in this matter, please contact John A. Kehoe at jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com or call (215) 792-6676.